Either/Or: A Fragment of Life 
Either/or is discredited by its principle reliance on the necessity to choose between an aesthetic or ethical life. Kierkegaard makes the point that we have to choose between these if we want to have purpose to life because of the inherent contradiction between the two. However this choice seems arbitrary and unnatural. Even if necessary (which I doubt it is), why propose a philosophy that's impossible for a vast majority of people to apply?While the logic is pretty shady for a work considered
Are passions, then, the Pagans of the soul? Reason alone baptized?I guess the choice of this quote in the beginning of the book tells us a lot about the common thread in this book and the rest of his work.So the book is divided into two parts and Victor Eremita is the editor who published the work.The part I written by the young ironic aesthete A contains a lot of witty aphorisms, an essay on Mozarts Don Giovanni, a very interesting essay on tragedy in ancient and modern drama and an insightful

I read an abridged version of this and let me tell you 220 pages is plenty. Not saying it's bad or anything, but I was relieved to get to the end. A lot to think about and there were many passages I underlined. I also noticed through the old margin scribbling that I had read part of this long ago, but my teenager self could not have known how silly it was to jump around in a work like this--useless. Either start from the beginning/Or not at all 😂 I guess I broke Kierkegaard's own admonishment to
A book full of musings on many different elements of life and issues which are still very much relevant today, Either/Or is a wonderful book, not just as a piece of philosophy, but as pure literature. Soren Kierkegaard writes like a poet, which makes his philosophical writings so entertaining and enlightening to read.A guide to a meaningful existence, Kierkegaard explores the aesthetic and ethical ideologies of life through two characters: A, the aesthetician and Judge Wilhelm, the ethicist.
Søren Kierkegaard was clever, arrogant, verbose, observant, cynical, ironic, prolific, religious, gifted. His writing is dense, polemical, lyrical, remarkable. His magnum opus, Either-Or, is an exceptional work. I struggled my way through it, much as I imagine I would struggle to climb Mount Everest through nebulous passages, up windy roads that sometimes narrowed, sometimes digressed into unexpected territory, always challenged my footing and my stamina. But on nearly every page there was a
Of course, a critic resembles a poet to a hair, except that he has no anguish in his heart, no music on his lips. This is one of those rare unclassifiable books, whose genre was born the day it was published and which has since left no heirs. Kierkegaard gives us what appears, at first, to be a sort of literary experiment: the papers of two imaginary characters, found inside the escritoire by a third imaginary character. These two charactersreferred to as A and Bserve as the titular either/or;
Søren Kierkegaard
Paperback | Pages: 640 pages Rating: 4.17 | 6967 Users | 165 Reviews

Particularize Books To Either/Or: A Fragment of Life
Original Title: | Enten-Eller |
ISBN: | 0140445773 (ISBN13: 9780140445770) |
Edition Language: | English URL https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/328663/eitheror-by-soren-kierkegaard/9780140445770/ |
Commentary Concering Books Either/Or: A Fragment of Life
'What if everything in the world were a misunderstanding, what if laughter were really tears?' Either/Or is the earliest of the major works of Søren Kierkegaard, one of the most startlingly original thinkers and writers of the nineteenth century, and the first which he wrote under a pseudonym, as he would for his greatest philosophical writings. Adopting the viewpoints of two distinct figures with radically different beliefs--the aesthetic young man of Part One, called simply 'A', and the ethical Judge Vilhelm of the second section--Kierkegaard reflects upon the search for a meaningful existence, contemplating subjects as diverse as Mozart, drama, boredom, and, in the famous Seducer's Diary, the cynical seduction and ultimate rejection of a young, beautiful woman. A masterpiece of duality, Either/Or is an exploration of the conflict between the aesthetic and the ethical--both meditating ironically and seductively upon Epicurean pleasures, and eloquently expounding the noble virtues of a morally upstanding life. This lightly abridged edition fully conveys the vigour and eloquence of the original. Alastair Hannay's introduction explains the philosophical background to the work and places it in the context of its times.Mention Appertaining To Books Either/Or: A Fragment of Life
Title | : | Either/Or: A Fragment of Life |
Author | : | Søren Kierkegaard |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 640 pages |
Published | : | December 1st 1992 by Penguin Classics (first published February 20th 1843) |
Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Classics. Religion |
Rating Appertaining To Books Either/Or: A Fragment of Life
Ratings: 4.17 From 6967 Users | 165 ReviewsEvaluate Appertaining To Books Either/Or: A Fragment of Life
Either/or is discredited by its principle reliance on the necessity to choose between an aesthetic or ethical life. Kierkegaard makes the point that we have to choose between these if we want to have purpose to life because of the inherent contradiction between the two. However this choice seems arbitrary and unnatural. Even if necessary (which I doubt it is), why propose a philosophy that's impossible for a vast majority of people to apply?While the logic is pretty shady for a work consideredEither/or is discredited by its principle reliance on the necessity to choose between an aesthetic or ethical life. Kierkegaard makes the point that we have to choose between these if we want to have purpose to life because of the inherent contradiction between the two. However this choice seems arbitrary and unnatural. Even if necessary (which I doubt it is), why propose a philosophy that's impossible for a vast majority of people to apply?While the logic is pretty shady for a work considered
Are passions, then, the Pagans of the soul? Reason alone baptized?I guess the choice of this quote in the beginning of the book tells us a lot about the common thread in this book and the rest of his work.So the book is divided into two parts and Victor Eremita is the editor who published the work.The part I written by the young ironic aesthete A contains a lot of witty aphorisms, an essay on Mozarts Don Giovanni, a very interesting essay on tragedy in ancient and modern drama and an insightful

I read an abridged version of this and let me tell you 220 pages is plenty. Not saying it's bad or anything, but I was relieved to get to the end. A lot to think about and there were many passages I underlined. I also noticed through the old margin scribbling that I had read part of this long ago, but my teenager self could not have known how silly it was to jump around in a work like this--useless. Either start from the beginning/Or not at all 😂 I guess I broke Kierkegaard's own admonishment to
A book full of musings on many different elements of life and issues which are still very much relevant today, Either/Or is a wonderful book, not just as a piece of philosophy, but as pure literature. Soren Kierkegaard writes like a poet, which makes his philosophical writings so entertaining and enlightening to read.A guide to a meaningful existence, Kierkegaard explores the aesthetic and ethical ideologies of life through two characters: A, the aesthetician and Judge Wilhelm, the ethicist.
Søren Kierkegaard was clever, arrogant, verbose, observant, cynical, ironic, prolific, religious, gifted. His writing is dense, polemical, lyrical, remarkable. His magnum opus, Either-Or, is an exceptional work. I struggled my way through it, much as I imagine I would struggle to climb Mount Everest through nebulous passages, up windy roads that sometimes narrowed, sometimes digressed into unexpected territory, always challenged my footing and my stamina. But on nearly every page there was a
Of course, a critic resembles a poet to a hair, except that he has no anguish in his heart, no music on his lips. This is one of those rare unclassifiable books, whose genre was born the day it was published and which has since left no heirs. Kierkegaard gives us what appears, at first, to be a sort of literary experiment: the papers of two imaginary characters, found inside the escritoire by a third imaginary character. These two charactersreferred to as A and Bserve as the titular either/or;
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.